To
the Cabinet Office, with copies to the various
Boundary Commission bodies, and certain other concerned
politicians etc.
I write as the
administrator of
the Pensioners Debout! site, and even more as an active
supporter of the campaign
www.votes-for-expat-brits.com and of the campaign for Expat
Citizens Rights in the EU.
Further I have
frequent
communication with Harry Shindler, the 95 year old campaigner
for
Political Representation for the British citizens abroad.
Harry draws attention to the words of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
Harry draws attention to the words of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
Article
21 (i)
1.
Everyone has the
right to take part in the government of his country, directly
or through freely
chosen representatives.
The
British
Government is a signatory to that Declaration.
Yet the British Government refuses to bring
forward a long
promised Bill present in the last Election Manifesto for 'Votes-for-
Life'.
In contrast France and Italy have long
understood the need
to recognise the value and the need to recognise the Citizen
Abroad. They have
constituency ‘deputies’ or assembly members to represent them at
a National
level.
Britain
cuts off our representation after 15 years.
When I first retired to France
at the age of 69 (I am now 84) I had the chance to vote for up
to 20 years. That
was cut dead by the Blair Government without any reference to my
opinion – thus taking
away quite arbitrarily my Right
to vote, notably important in the Referendum–
The Citizen abroad has huge ties to the United
Kingdom – Socially
(family), Culturally and
Financially. I and my
wife are in all
three ways so linked, that the current Brexit approach could
seriously harm our
way of life.
But these are incidental to the urgent need
to be
represented in our National Government – The Government of the
Nation. The Nation is the
assemblage of Citizens,
wherever they live. The
Government
has responsibility for all citizens, and should have a
sensitivity towards them, as the expatriate
should have towards the Government. Currently this dialogue and
mutual interest is
severed.
That severance can only be healed by creating
overseas
constituencies.
Understand the following points.
1. The
Overseas
Citizens have strong links with Britain.
2. The
Overseas
Citizens are often
immensely proud of
their British roots.
3. The
Overseas
Citizens have little interest in the minutiae of management of
any on-shore
constituency, but they most surely often have an interest in the
standing and
activities of Britain
in the World, and the particular part that they themselves play
in these.
4. The
existing MPs, conscious of their own parochial
interests are reluctant to extend the franchise of their localised constituency to
overseas voters.
They would probably vote down a simple extension of the
principle
of Votes-for-Life.
5. The
Overseas
Citizens have various problems
which
relate to British Government deliberations – pensions – treaty
arrangements affecting
..health .. work
permits.. investment/savings opportunities.. bank accounts …
cross border movements..,
for example.
6. At
the last
General Election & Referendum more than 250,000 Citizens
abroad registered to Vote. Remember
many including myself and my wife were prevented from voting.
I am not here
suggesting that at this
time one proposes as many
overseas constituencies as has France. But one could start with
TWO minimum, one for
Europe and one for the rest of the World.
As the years pass, and
the notion becomes
accepted as normal, then the number could increase.
At this time one
detects a resentment on
the part of many expatriates of all ages. towards the British
Government Many would
raise the two fingers to it. That attitude is picked up by our
foreign neighbours. By
fulfilling the promise to grant the
vote-for-life in the manner proposed here, this could be turned
about, so that
the expatriate takes a pride in their Government.Yours respectfully,