Below is a letter from Tom McNally [Lord McNally] Minister of State for Justice, replying to Sir Roger Gale MP in November 2012 on the subject of Inheritance.
*******************
I am writing in response to your letter of 10 September concerning a further query
from
Oliver Rowland of the English Language Newspaper "Connexion" on crossborder
inheritance and further to your earlier letter on the same subject of 1 May and
my reply of 10 July.
Your
query concerns the position of UK residents owning property in France and what
law will apply to that property when the Succession Regulation comes into force
in 2015. As you are aware, the UK did not participate in the Regulation, as it
was entitled to do under Title V (Protocol 21) to the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union. As outlined in my letter of 10 July, the decision to
remain outside the final Regulation was taken because the UK had been unable to
secure the necessary amendments that would guarantee the best outcome for
British citizens, businesses and charities. Remaining outside the Regulation
does not significantly change the current legal regime. .
To clarify
your original query, the Succession Regulation will not apply to the succession
of a deceased's estate where they die habitually resident in the UK and own a
holiday home abroad, for example in France. The current legal regime remains in force.
This means that the law that will apply to the property in France will be
French law.
Succession
is, however, a complex legal issue and a number of issues need to be taken into
consideration in each specific case. This has, in some respects, become more
complicated as a result of the relationship between the provisions of the new
EU Regulation on Succession and the laws which currently operate within the UK.
As a result of the Regulation coming into force, there will be certain
circumstances where the Regulation could apply to the succession of the estate
of a UK national who dies habitually resident in the UK and where their estate
includes real property (defined as immovable property) located in France.
Under
Article 10 of the Succession Regulation which deals with subsidiary
jurisdiction (where the deceased is habitually resident in one Member State at
the time of their death but had assets in another Member State), the French
courts could claim jurisdiction and be able to deal with their estate in two
situations:
i)
where the deceased had previously habitually resided in
France and no more than five years had elapsed since that point to change that
situation; and
ii) no other
court in another country that was legally bound by the Regulation had
jurisdiction on the basis of the deceased's previous habitual residence. For
example, for property and other assets located in France no other Member State
could claim jurisdiction. As a result, the French courts would be entitled to
deal with the succession to assets in France.
Where
the French court has jurisdiction to deal with assets but where the deceased
died habitually resident in another country, the French courts would be
required to apply the law of the country where the deceased was habitually
resident on the basis of Article 21 of the Succession Regulation (the
applicable law). The general rule here is that it would be this law that would
apply to the deceased's entire estate However, as the UK is not party to the
Regulation, Article 34 of the Succession Regulation takes effect (the law that
applies where the country is not a party to the Regulation). In this situation although a UK law would
still apply, the result of its application would be a reference back to the law
of France and therefore French law would apply to any real property.
The
main benefit of the Regulation is the ability of applying one law to the entire
succession of a deceased's estate whether through choice (via a will) or by
virtue of the law of the Member State where the deceased died habitually
resident. For UK nationals residing in another Member State, UK law can be
chosen to apply to their estate upon death. However, the application of a UK
law would still mean that where this involved real property, reference would
still fall to the law of the country where that property was located.
In simple terms, if UK law applies to the succession of
an estate and this involves a property which is located overseas, the law in
the UK will dictate that the law of the country in which the property is
situated should apply. This means that the Regulation does not lessen the
difficulties for British citizens who die in the UK or abroad where this
involves real property. My officials are currently considering whether
improvements can be made through domestic law that could address these
problems.
As I am sure you appreciate, succession and succession
planning is a complex area and the specifics of individual cases should be the
subject of professional legal advice.
I hope, however, this helps explain the
current position and clarify matters.
Yours
sincerely,
TOM MCNALLY
Comment - The first of the highlighted sections above seems to be a little self-contradictory. If one lives in France in a owned property, and one also has assets in the UK, it would seem that though UK inheritance law can apply to the UK assets, yet still French law applies to the French property (?or not?). I think this needs further clarification. What significance is in the word 'reference'?
Comment - The first of the highlighted sections above seems to be a little self-contradictory. If one lives in France in a owned property, and one also has assets in the UK, it would seem that though UK inheritance law can apply to the UK assets, yet still French law applies to the French property (?or not?). I think this needs further clarification. What significance is in the word 'reference'?
